| 摘要: |
| “两藏”战略是中国粮食安全的根本之策。为梳理“藏粮于技”概念缘起和内涵，以马克思主义科技观、技术创新与技术变迁理论、制度与技术的关系为理论基础，分析了“藏粮于技”战略的理论逻辑和内涵演变。结果表明：1）“藏粮于技”是中国共产党马克思主义科技观的重要实践，其制度创新与技术创新双向互促特色鲜明。2）“藏”的内涵包括市场和产量调控、完善粮食市场体系和价格形成机制，建立精准、科学合理的粮食调控体系，并解决粮食安全、生态安全、食品安全、农民增收等可持续问题。3）“技”的内容扩展为全要素、全产业链、多学科技术集成和应用，技术扩散呈现多主体交互、反馈，农业技术与数字技术融合发展。本研究从科技自强自立、摆脱路径依赖、内涵式发展道路和创新体系效能4个方面提出对策建议，为进一步明确“藏粮于技”战略未来取向和实现路径提供了决策参考。 |
| 关键词: 粮食安全战略 藏粮于技 技术进步 制度创新 马克思主义科技观 |
| DOI：10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2024.03.26 |
| 投稿时间：2023-05-08 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目（22ZDA117；21ZDA056） |
|
| Further discussion on the strategy of ‘Grain storage in technology’： Connotation identification, theoretical support and future orientation |
|
GAO Yun, ZHONG Yu*
|
| (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development， Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences， Beijing 100081， China) |
| Abstract: |
| The strategy of ‘Storing grain in land and technology’ is the fundamental policy for China food security. In order to clarify the origin and connotation of the concept of ‘Storing grain in technology’， the theoretical logic and connotation evolution of the strategy was analyzed based on Marxism on science and technology， theory of technological innovation and relationship between institutional and technology innovation. The results show that： 1） The strategy of ‘Storing grain in technology’ is an important practice of the Communist Party of China for Marxism on science and technology， which has distinctive characteristic of mutual-beneficial relationship between institutional and technology innovation. 2） The connotation of ‘storing’ includes market and yield regulation， improving the grain market system and pricing mechanism， establishing an accurate， scientific and reasonable grain regulation system， and addressing sustainable issues such as food security， ecological security， food safety and farmers' income increasing. 3） The content of ‘technology’ is expanded to the integration and application of all elements， the entire industry chain， and multi-disciplinary technologies. Technical extension presents multi-agent interaction and feedback， and integrates with digital technology. To further clarify the future orientation and implementation path of the ‘Storing grain in technology’ strategy， this study proposes suggestions from four aspects as follows： Technology self-reliance， getting rid of path dependence， intensive development path and innovation system efficiency. |
| Key words: food security storing grain in technology technical progress institutional innovation Marxism on science and technology |
