引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 905次   下载 564 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
农户对耕地保护基金实施满意度评价及影响因素分析——以成都市永安镇、金桥镇和崇州市江源镇为例
刘小庆, 蔡银莺
0
(华中农业大学 公共管理学院, 武汉 430070)
摘要:
近年来,广东、四川等部分地区开始试行耕地保护经济补偿政策,为了解农户参与耕地保护经济补偿政策的反响,以在全国率先建立耕地保护基金的四川省成都市为实证,利用描述性统计分析方法和Logistic回归模型对成都市农户参与耕地保护基金的满意程度及其影响因素进行分析。结果表明:1)49.76%的受访者对耕地保护基金的实施持满意态度,农民对耕地保护基金实施满意度呈中等水平;2) 农民对耕地保护基金实施的满意度取决其个体特征、家庭特征、政策认识及政策影响感知等因素。其中,耕地保护补偿政策对农民家庭在耕地投入和养老保障等方面的影响感知对其满意度的影响最为显著。当其他变量一定时,相对于“极不满意”,对养老保障的影响感知每增加1个单位,农民对政策实施的评价为“不满意”、“一般”、“较满意”、“非常满意”的可能性将分别提高69.1%;此外,农民家庭的耕地资源越破碎,其对政策的满意度越低;农户家庭生计多样性指数越大,农户对耕地保护基金政策越满意。
关键词:  耕地  保护基金  满意度  Logistic模型
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2014.03.30
投稿时间:2013-09-17
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(09CJY021);国家自然科学基金项目(41371519、40901288);中国博士后科学基金特别资助(2013T60729);中国博士后科学基金项目(20110491160);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2011PY008)
Analysis of farmers’satisfaction on the implementation of cultivated land protection fund and influencing factors:A case study of Yongan Town,Jinqiao Town and Jiangyuan Town in Chengdu City
LIU Xiao-qing, CAI Yin-ying
(College of Public Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
Abstract:
Some regions have implemented the policy of the economic compensation on cultivated land protection, such as Guangdong province, Sichuan province.To get the farmers'response to the economic compensation policy, the logistic regressive model was set up to analyze the factors affecting the farmers'satisfaction to the fund of cultivated land protection in this paper.The affecting factors were divided into 4 groups:personal characteristic factors, family characteristic factors, understanding of the policy and effects of the policy.The results showed that:1) 49.76 percent of the farmers were satisfied with the implementation of cultivated land protection fund;2) The perception of farmers on the effects of the capital investment on cultivated land and the rural elder security played the most important role in the satisfaction to the fund of cultivated land protection.When other variables were constant, every one unit increased in the effect on rural elder security, the possibility of "dissatisfied", " general", "satisfied", "very satisfied" would increase by 69.1% with respect to "very dissatisfied".The higher fragmentation degree of crop land was, the worse the evaluation would be.The index of livelihood diversity was another important factor affecting the evaluation towards the fund of cultivated land protection.The stronger ability to resist risks, the higher evaluation towards the fund of cultivated land protection was.
Key words:  cultivated land  fund of protection  satisfaction  the logistic regressive model