引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1048次   下载 646 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
参与和未参与灌溉管理改革农户生计资本的对比分析——基于内蒙古灌区农户的调研
赵立娟
0
(内蒙古财经大学 金融学院, 呼和浩特 010051)
摘要:
基于英国国际发展署的可持续生计分析框架,利用内蒙古灌区农户的调研数据,比较分析参与和未参与灌溉管理改革农户的生计资本状况。结果表明:2种类型农户5种生计资本存在显著性差异,改革地区农户物质资本、人力资本和社会资本指标明显高于未改革地区农户,自然资本两种类型农户没有差别,几乎相同,而未改革地区农户金融资本略高于改革地区农户。总体看,灌溉管理改革地区农户的生计资本状况好于没有实行灌溉管理改革地区的农户,但要进一步改善灌区农户的生计还需要得到多方面的帮助。
关键词:  灌溉管理  农户生计  生计资本  改革
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2014.01.29
投稿时间:2013-04-26
基金项目:国家社科基金项目(11CJY060);内蒙古自治区高校青年科技英才支持计划(NJYT-12-B20)
Comparative analysis on livelihood condition of households in irrigation management reform:Based on investigation data of irrigation districts of Inner Mongolia
ZHAO Li-juan
(College of Finance, Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, Hohhot 010051, China)
Abstract:
This paper takes comparative analysis on livelihood assets of households that participated and non-participated in irrigation management reform based on investigation data of irrigation districts of Inner Mongolia.The study indicate that there are significant differences for households that participated comparing with households that did not participated the reform in five livelihood capitals,such as physical capital,human capital,social capital,financial capital and natural capital.The situation of participation households is better than non-participation ones in first three capitals.Financial capital of non-participation is better than participation,and natural capital is almost the same.Overall,livelihood assets of participation are better than non-participation,but households' livelihoods in irrigation district still need more helps.
Key words:  irrigation management  farmer’s livelihood  livelihood capital  reform