“生产-生活-生态”功能评价研究进展与展望

Progress and prospects of “production-living-ecological” functions evaluation

关键词:  “生产、生活、生态”功能  评价研究  进展  展望  

Key words:  “production-living-ecological” functions  evaluation research  progress  prospect

摘要:

“生产-生活-生态”功能评价是认识国土空间发展现状的科学依据，对优化国土空间布局、实现区域可持续发展具有重要意义。为全面了解“三生”功能评价的研究现状，以““三生”功能”与““三生”空间”为关键词，搜索CNKI数据库与Web of Science核心合集2010—2020年发表的文献，并通过文献调研法、对比法与归纳法对373篇相关文献进行研究，系统梳理“三生”功能的内涵、承载主体、发展目标、分类与评价方法。分析发现:已有研究对“三生”功能内涵的认识基本一致，但尚未形成统一的“三生”功能分类体系；“三生”功能评价的研究框架与指标设置有待进一步完善。未来应加强“三生”功能内涵、形成机制与相互关系研究，完善“三生”功能分类，建立科学的、差异化的“三生”功能评价指标体系，创新“三生”功能评价方法，提高“三生”功能评价结果的实践应用，将评价结果应用于“三生”功能优化，指导产业发展与公共服务设施布局。

Abstract:

The evaluation of “production-living-ecological” functions(PLEFs)is the scientific basis for grasping the development status of geographical space and is of great significance for the optimizing the layout of geographical space and achieving the goal of regional sustainable development. In order to comprehensively understand the progress of the evaluation of PLEFs, “production-living-ecological” functions and “production-living-ecological” space are taken as keywords to search CNKI and Web of Science Core Collection. A total of 373 related papers published from 2010 to 2020 are obtained. Literature review methods, comparative analysis, and induction are employed to systematically summarize the connotation, carrier, development objective, classification and the evaluation methods of PLEFs in these researches. The results show that the researchers have reached a consensus on the connotation of PLEFs, but the unified function classification system has not been formed. The research framework and evaluation index of PLEFs needs further improvement. The future studies should be focused on strengthening the research of connotation, formation mechanism and interrelationships of PLEFs, improving the function classification system and establishing a scientific and differentiated evaluation index system of PLEFs, innovating the evaluation methods and improving the practical applicability of evaluation results that can be applied to the optimization of PLEFs, the guidance of the industry development and the layout of public service facilities.