| 本文已被：浏览 1784次 下载 1082次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
| 基因型和环境互作对黄淮海夏玉米品种籽粒产量的影响 |
|
岳海旺1,魏建伟1,谢俊良1,姚文影2,曹红梅3,陈淑萍1,彭海成1,卜俊周1*
|
|
|
| (1.河北省农林科学院 旱作农业研究所/河北省农作物抗旱研究重点实验室, 河北 衡水 053000;2.衡水市桃城区农业农村局农机中心, 河北 衡水 053000;3.衡水市农业农村局土壤肥料工作站, 河北 衡水 053000) |
|
| 摘要: |
| 为准确评价黄海海地区夏玉米品种的稳定性、适应性和丰产性，采用稳定性指数(WAASB)和同时选择指数(WAASBY)对2018—2019年黄淮海地区25个夏玉米品种进行连续2年的产量进行分析。结果表明:籽粒产量在不同品种和试点间存在极显著差异(P<0.001)，品种和试点间存在极显著互作效应。GY(籽粒产量)×WAASB双标图显示，‘衡玉7182’，‘衡9’，‘华农138’，‘宝玉168’，‘郑单958’和‘蠡玉86’等品种为丰产性突出、稳定性较好的品种。其中，‘衡9’的WAASBY得分最高，属于参试品种中表现较好的品种之一。而‘农大108’的WAASBY得分最低，属于表现较差的品种之一。安阳、德州、石家庄和邯郸最适宜种植的夏玉米品种均为‘浚单29’、‘农大108’、‘浚单20’和‘裕丰303’，深州最适宜种植的品种是‘登海685’，运城最适宜种植的品种是‘中单856’、‘衡玉7182’和‘梦玉908’。综上所述，WAASB和WAASBY可为黄淮海夏玉米品种的示范和推广提供依据。 |
| 关键词: AMMI模型 GGE双标图 BLUP 稳定性 多环境测试 |
| DOI：10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2022.04.03 |
| 投稿时间：2021-05-15 |
| 基金项目:国家玉米产业技术体系(CARS-02)；河北省重点研发计划(20326305D)；河北省科技支撑计划(16226323D-X)；河北省农林科学院创新工程科技专项；河北省农林科学院重大成果转化项目；河北省“三三三人才工程”人才培养项目(A202101056)；衡水市重点研发计划(2020014005C) |
|
| Effect of interaction between genotype and environment on the grain yield of summer maize hybrids in Huanghuaihai Region |
|
YUE Haiwang1,WEI Jianwei1,XIE Junliang1,YAO Wenying2,CAO Hongmei3,CHEN Shuping1,PENG Haicheng1,BU Junzhou1*
|
| (1.Dryland Farming Institute/Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Crops Drought Resistance Research, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Hengshui 053000, China;2.Agricultural Machinery Center, Agriculture and Rural Bureau of Taocheng District, Hengshui 053000, China;3.Soil and Fertilizer Workstation of Hengshui Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Hengshui 053000, China) |
| Abstract: |
| In order to effectively identify and evaluate the stability, adaptability and high yield maize hybrids, and select promising hybrids suitable for Huanghuaihai Regions. The stability index WAASB and simultaneous selection index WAASBY were used to analyze 25 summer maize genotypes during two consecutive years(2018-2019)in this study. The results showed that there were highly significant(P<0. 001)differences in grain yield between different hybrids and locations, and a highly significant interaction effect between genotypes and environments. According to the GY(Grain-yield)×WAASB biplot, ‘Hengyu 7182', ‘Heng 9', ‘Huanong 138', ‘Baoyu 168', ‘Zhengdan 958' and ‘Liyu 86' were identified the genotypes with outstanding high yield and good stability. Among the selected genotypes, ‘Heng 9' had the highest WAASBY score, which was the best-performing genotype among the tested genotypes. ‘Nongda 108' had the lowest WAASBY score, which was the worst-performce genotype. The most suitable hybrids for planting in Anyang, Dezhou, Shijiazhuang and Handan are ‘Xundan 29', ‘Nongda 108', ‘Xundan 20' and ‘Yufeng 303'. The most suitable hybrid for planting in Shenzhou is ‘Denghai 685', the most suitable hybrids for planting in Yuncheng are ‘Zhongdan 856', ‘Hengyu 7182' and ‘Mengyu 908'. This study showed the importance of WAASB and WAASBY in the grain yield analysis of summer maize genotypes in Huanghuaihai Region, which provided a basis for demonstration and promotion of maize genotypes. |
| Key words: AMMI model GGE biplot BLUP stability METs |
