| 摘要: |
| 在2021年全国脱贫攻坚取得全面胜利之际，为合理、客观地评价农村“光伏扶贫”政策的实施效果，本研究基于2011—2018年中国县域面板统计数据，采用双重差分法(DID)对中国农村“光伏扶贫”政策实施的社会经济净效益进行评估，并进一步根据DID基准回归结果展开成本-效益测算。研究表明:1)在“光伏扶贫”政策下，光伏扶贫县的第二产业从业人数、居民储蓄存款余额分别显著提高10.37%、6.04%；2)更具光照优势与缺乏就业选择的西部县、自治县与深度贫困区将从“光伏扶贫”政策的实施中获得更大的社会效益福利；非自治县与非深度贫困区在实施“光伏扶贫”政策后经济效益更为显著；3)社会经济效益的产生机理源于“光伏扶贫”政策中“自有岗位+公益岗位”双重就业机会、政府财政补贴、发电上网收益、村集体定期分红以及“光伏+产业”发展模式等途径。鉴于此，为推动该政策的持续性发展，提出以下建议:多渠道保障已建成光伏电站运行可持续性；双向加强光伏扶贫宣教工作，着力调动建设积极性；因地制宜落实光伏电站建设，强化规模化建设应对能力。 |
| 关键词: 光伏扶贫 社会经济效益 双重差分法 |
| DOI：10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2022.02.26 |
| 投稿时间：2021-05-28 |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA045) |
|
| China's experience of poverty alleviation: Socioeconomic effect of rural “photovoltaic poverty alleviation” policy |
|
LI Na1,ZHANG Guanglai1*,ZHOU Yingheng1,WU Wenjie2
|
| (1.School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China;2.School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China) |
| Abstract: |
| In the context of the overall victory of the China's national poverty alleviation campaign in 2021, in order to objectively evaluate the implementation effect of the “photovoltaic poverty alleviation(PPA)” policy in rural areas. Based on the county level panel data in China from 2011 to 2018, this study analyzes the socioeconomic effect of the PPA policy by using a difference-in-differences strategy and conduct a back-of-envelope cost-benefit analysis for PPA policy. The results show that: 1)The PPA policy results in increasing the number of employees in the secondary industry by 10. 37% and 6. 04% in the household saving deposit; 2)Western counties with more light advantages and autonomous counties, deep poverty areas with less employment options show larger poverty alleviation impact than their counterparts; The economic benefits of non-autonomous counties and non-deep poverty areas become more significant after the implementation of PPA policy; 3)The behind mechanisms are the dual employment opportunities of “self-owned positions & public welfare positions”, government financial subsidies, income from power generation and internet access, regular dividends for the village collective, and the development mode of “photovoltaic & industry”. Based on above findings, a few suggestions are put forward as follows: The government should ensure the sustainability of completed photovoltaic power stations through multiple channels, strengthen the propaganda and education of PPA in both directions, focus on mobilizing the enthusiasm of construction; and implement the construction of photovoltaic power stations in accordance with local conditions and strengthen the capacity to respond to large-scale construction of photovoltaic power stations. |
| Key words: photovoltaic poverty alleviation socioeconomic effect difference-in-differences model |
