| 摘要: |
| 为探究不同资本匮乏型农户在面临不同生计风险冲击时如何应对，以陕南秦巴山区414份农户调查数据为例，在判断农户生计资本类型并测算生计风险的基础上，采用有效性评价和Logistic回归分析方法，对农户风险应对策略的影响因素进行了研究。结果表明:不同类型农户偏好的风险应对策略组合不同；并且，“社会保险及社会救济”与“改进生产技术”的策略有效性评价较好，综合评价值分别为2.41、2.39；生计风险-生计资本类型的交互项对农户风险应对策略影响显著，且不同生计资本类型、不同抗风险能力的交互效应存在差异。因此，为实现农户稳定脱贫、巩固脱贫攻坚成果，应结合农户自身生计资本类型及外部生计风险，制定差异化的扶贫措施以实现防风险与强生计相结合的稳定脱贫战略。 |
| 关键词: 生计资本 生计风险 风险应对策略 有效性排序 交互效应 |
| DOI：10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.09.21 |
| 投稿时间：2019-12-04 |
| 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(19YJAZH076)；中国科学院A类战略性先导科技专项子课题(XDA23060304)；国家社会科学基金西部项目(17XJY018)；陕西省科技厅软科学研究项目(2017KRM135)；甘肃省自然科学基金(1610RJZA096) |
|
| Risk coping strategies for different capital-deficient farmers: Taking the Qinba mountains in southern Shaanxi Province as an example |
|
SU Fang1,SONG Nini1,MA Jing2,LUO Wenchun1
|
| (1.School of Economics and Management, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an 710021, China;2.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730030, China) |
| Abstract: |
| To explore how different capital deficient farmers respond when facing different livelihood risk, 414 peasant household survey data in Qinba mountains are taken as study case. Based on the judgment of farmer's livelihood capital type and measuring their livelihood risk, using effectiveness evaluation and Logistic regression analysis method, the influence factors on peasants' coping strategies are studied. The results show that different kinds of peasant household take different combination strategies to respond to the risks. Moreover, the effectiveness evaluation of the strategies of “Social insurance and social relief” and “Improving production technology” is good, with the comprehensive evaluation values of 2. 41 and 2. 39, respectively. The interaction term of livelihood risk and livelihood capital types has significant influence on farmers' risk coping strategies, and the interaction effects of different types of livelihood capital and capabilities of resist risks are different. Therefore, in order to realize stable poverty alleviation and consolidate the achievements of poverty alleviation, it is necessary to combine the types of livelihood capital of farmers and external livelihood risks first, and then to formulate differentiated poverty alleviation measures to achieve a stable poverty alleviation strategy, which is risk prevention and strengthens livelihood. |
| Key words: livelihood capital livelihood risk risk coping strategies validity ranking interaction effect |
