引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1369次   下载 736 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
农户兼业对其施用生物农药的影响——基于农业社会化服务的调节作用
操敏敏1,2,3,齐振宏1,2,3*,刘可1,2,3,陈雪婷1,2,3,黄炜虹1,2,3
0
(1.华中农业大学 经济管理学院, 武汉 430070;2.华中农业大学 双水双绿研究院, 武汉 430070;3.湖北农村发展研究中心, 武汉 430070)
摘要:
基于湖北、江苏2省粮食主产区的603份农户微观调研数据,采用二元logistic回归检验了农户兼业对其施用生物农药行为的影响并着重探究农业社会化服务在二者间存在的调节作用。结果表明:1)农户兼业会显著降低其施用生物农药的可能性,且农户兼业的负向影响随着兼业程度的提高而增强;2)农业社会化服务对不同兼业类型的农户及其施用生物农药行为间的调节作用存在异质性。具体而言,对于Ⅰ兼农户,农机雇佣服务在两者间存在显著正向调节作用,然而金融贷款服务则发挥了显著负向调节作用。对于Ⅱ兼农户,由于农业保险服务在两者间的正向调节作用,农户兼业对其施用生物农药的消极影响有所减弱。基于此,本研究提出,借助农技人员推广生物农药、提升农户的生态认知水平;加大对生物农药的政策扶持、提高施用生物农药的直接补贴;完善农业社会化服务体系建设,有针对性的选择服务对象和提供服务内容等政策启示。
关键词:  兼业农户  生物农药  农业社会化服务  调节作用
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.01.21
投稿时间:2019-01-16
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300210);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2662018YJ019)
Effects of farmers' concurrent business on biopesticide application: The moderating effect of agricultural social service
CAO Minmin1,2,3,QI Zhenhong1,2,3*,LIU Ke1,2,3,CHEN Xueting1,2,3,HUANG Weihong1,2,3
(1.College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;2.Institute of ShuangshuiShuanglv, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;3.Hubei Rural Development Research Center, Wuhan 430070, China)
Abstract:
Based on a micro-survey data of 603 farmers in the main grain producing areas of Hubei and Jiangsu provinces, a binary logistic regression model is used to test the effect of farmers' concurrent business on the farmers' behavior of applying biological pesticides, and the moderating effect of agricultural social service between them is also investigated. The results showed that: 1)The farmers' concurrent business significantly reduces the possibility of farmers applying biological pesticides, and this negative influence increases with the increase of the degree of concurrent business; 2)There is heterogeneity in the moderating effect of agricultural social service on farmers with different types of concurrent business between their behavior of applying biological pesticides. Specifically, for multiple occupations farmers type I, the agricultural machinery employment service has a significant positive moderating effect between the two. However, the financial loan service plays a significant negative regulatory role. For multiple occupations farmers type II, due to the positive moderating effect of agricultural insurance service between the two, the negative effect of multiple occupations farmers type II on the application of biological pesticides to farmers is weakened. Based on the findings, it is proposed that the government should promote the ecological cognition of farmers by popularizing biological pesticides with the help of agricultural technicians, increase the policy support for biological pesticides and increase the direct subsidy for the application of biological pesticides including improving the construction of agricultural social service system, selecting the targeted service objects and providing the targeted service content.
Key words:  farmers' concurrent business  biological pesticides  agricultural social service  moderating effect