引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1161次   下载 508 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
微咸水与淡水轮灌对春玉米土壤CO2和N2O排放的影响
王帅杰1, 杨培岭1, 苏艳平1, 商放泽2, 魏琛琛1, 任树梅1
0
(1.中国农业大学 水利与土木工程学院, 北京 100083;2.清华大学 土木水利学院, 北京 100084)
摘要:
为探究咸淡轮灌模式下春玉米土壤温室气体的排放特性,采用4种水质,即淡水和矿化度分别为2、3.5和5 g/L的微咸水;2种轮灌方式,即淡水—微咸水(1∶1)和淡水—微咸水—微咸水(1∶2)循环轮灌进行滴灌试验,分析了不同处理对农田土壤CO2、N2O排放和春玉米产量的影响。结果表明:1)1:2轮灌处理CO2和N2O日平均排放通量比1∶1轮灌分别低10.26%、8.74%。2)矿化度为3.5和5 g/L微咸水处理CO2气体日均排放通量比2 g/L分别低27.82%、31.16%,N2O气体日平均排放通量比2 g/L分别低4.46%、8.23%。3)相比2 g/L处理,3.5和5 g/L处理产量平均减少5.92%、11.05%;1∶2轮灌比1∶1轮灌产量平均减少2.00%。4)显著性分析表明:水质对CO2气体日平均排放通量和玉米产量的影响显著(P<0.05),对N2O气体排放通量无显著影响(P>0.05);轮灌方式对CO2、N2O气体排放通量和玉米产量的影响不显著(P>0.05)。
关键词:  玉米  微咸水  轮灌  CO2  N2O  土壤
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.10.05
投稿时间:2018-01-18
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51679239)
Effects of alternative irrigation between brackish water and fresh water on CO2 and N2O emission from spring maize soil
WANG Shuaijie1, YANG Peiling1, SU Yanping1, SHANG Fangze2, WEI Chenchen1, REN Shumei1
(1.College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;2.School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Abstract:
In order to investigate the influences of alternative irrigation between brackish water and fresh water on greenhouse gas emission from spring maize soil, drip irrigation experiments with four kinds of water quality and two different irrigation methods were conducted. The results showed that:The average daily emission of CO2 and N2O flux of 1:2 alternative irrigation were respectively reduced by 10.26% and 8.74% compared with that of 1:1 alternative irrigation. The average emission of CO2 and N2O flux were 27.82% and 31.16% lower than that of 2.0 g/L and the average emissions flux of N2O gas were 4.46% and 8.23% lower than that of 2.0 g/L, respectively. Compared to 2.0 g/L brackish water treatment, the corn yield of 3.5 g/L and 5.0 g/L treatment respectively decreased by 5.92% and 11.05% on average. The corn yield of 1:2 alternative irrigation treatment was 2.00% lower than that of 1:1 on average. The results significant difference analysis showed that:The water quality had a significant effect on the daily average emission of CO2 flux and maize yield (P<0.05), whereas the water quality did not have significant effects on N2O emission flux (P>0.05); The effect of alternative irrigation on CO2 and N2O emission fluxes and maize yield were not significant (P >0.05).
Key words:  maize  brackish water  alternative irrigation  CO2  N2O  soil