引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1222次   下载 637 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
土壤墒情预测模型对比
牛宏飞1,2, 张钟莉莉2, 孙仕军1, 郑文刚2, 王材源3, 杨利红4
0
(1.沈阳农业大学 水利学院, 沈阳 110866;2.北京农业信息技术研究中心, 北京 100097;3.北京市水文总站, 北京 100089;4.云南省科学技术情报研究院, 昆明 650051)
摘要:
为实现实时准确的墒情预报,以北京市延庆区为例,利用在该地区获取的2012-2016年5年的系列土壤墒情和气象数据,对土壤墒情预测模型进行了对比研究。通过相关性分析选取时段初墒值W0、降雨、湿度、气温、气压、地温和蒸发7种影响因子,对土壤墒情分别建立线性回归方程、基于主成分分析的径向基函数(PCA-RBF)神经网络和误差反向传导(BP)神经网络3种预测模型,并对3种模型预测结果进行了对比分析。结果显示:PCA-RBF神经网络模型精度最高,平均精度达到96.8%,线性回归模型和BP神经网络模型分别为94.6%和95.7%。研究认为,PCA-RBF神经网络具有稳定性好、精度高的特点,可以很好的实现土壤墒情预测。
关键词:  土壤墒情  相关分析  线性回归  PCA-RBF神经网络  BP神经网络
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.08.16
投稿时间:2017-11-27
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0403102);科技创新能力建设专项(KJCX20170204);国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303125);国家自然科学基金项目(51609137);国家留学基金资助项目(201308210026);北京市博士后工作经费资助项目;辽宁省教育厅项目(2009A630)
Comparative study on soil moisture content prediction model
NIU Hongfei1,2, ZHANGZHONG Lili2, SUN Shijun1, ZHENG Wengang2, WANG Caiyuan3, YANG Lihong4
(1.College of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China;2.Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China;3.Beijing Hydrological Terminus, Beijing 100089, China;4.Yunnan Academy of Scientific & Technical Information, Kunming 650051, China)
Abstract:
Real-time and accurate prediction of soil moisture content is of great significance for irrigation management and drought resistance.In order to realize real-time accurate moisture prediction,a comparative study of soil moisture content prediction model was constructed in this study.Taking Yanqing District of Beijing as an example,a comparative study of the soil moisture prediction models were constructed by using the series of soil moisture and meteorological data obtained in this area from 2012 to 2016.Through the correlation analysis,initial moisture content W0,rainfall,humidity,temperature,barometric pressure,ground temperature and evaporation were selected to establish linear regression model,PCA-RBF Neural network model and error backtracking (BP) neural network model,and the prediction results of those three models were compared.The results showed that the accuracy of PCA-RBF neural network model was the highest,with an average precision of 96.8%.The linear regression model and BP neural network model were 94.6% and 95.7%,respectively.The study showed that the PCA-RBF neural network had the characteristics of good stability and high precision,which could well predict the soil moisture content.
Key words:  soil moisture content  correlation analysis  linear regression  PCA-RBF neural network  BP neural network