| 本文已被：浏览 783次 下载 477次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
| 西部典型山区农户的生计状况分析——以四川省宝兴县为例 |
|
刘菊1,2, 傅斌1,3, 王玉宽1,3, 徐佩1,3
|
|
|
| (1.中国科学院 水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都 610041;2.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;3.万州典型区生态环境监测重点站, 重庆 404020) |
|
| 摘要: |
| 为揭示山区农户的生计状况，采用可持续生计分析框架，以西部典型山区宝兴县为例，通过实地调研，对不同生计策略农户的生计资本和生计后果进行对比分析，结果表明：1）2次地震对宝兴县农户生计资本的影响主要体现在物质资本和金融资本两方面；2）农为主型生计策略农户的自然资本显著高于非农为主型和非农型农户，但其人力资本和物质资本显著低于后2种农户，不同生计策略农户的金融资本和社会资本差异不显著；3）农为主型生计策略农户的生计后果最差，其陷入贫困的比例最高，对生态环境的不利影响最大。但因其拥有较高的自然资本，可以选择特色农业、生计多样化和参加生态补偿等多种生计发展策略。 |
| 关键词: 农户 生计资本 生计策略 生计后果 地震 |
| DOI：10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.12.18 |
| 投稿时间：2016-03-30 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（41371539）；中国科学院西部之光项目（Y2R2180180） |
|
| Comparative analysis of farmer households' livelihood in the typical mountainous regions of Western China: A case study of Baoxing County,Sichuan Province |
|
LIU Ju1,2, FU Bin1,3, WANG Yu-kuan1,3, XU Pei1,3
|
| (1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3.Wanzhou Station of Reservoir Eco-environment Monitoring, Chongqing 404020, China) |
| Abstract: |
| To reveal the livelihood status quo of farmers households in mountainous regions,analyzes of field survey data and comparison of livelihood capital and consequences for the livelihoods among farmer households with different livelihood strategies were conducted by taking Baoxing County,Sichuan Province as study object and using the sustainable livelihood analysis framework.The results show that:1) The impact of earthquakes on the livelihood capital of farmer households in Baoxing County is mainly reflected in physical capital and financial capital;2) The natural capital of farmer households with farming-dominated strategy is significantly higher than that of farmer households with non-farming-dominated strategy and non-farm strategy.While the human capital and physical capital of farmer households with farming-dominated strategy are significantly lower than that of farmer households with non-farming-dominated strategy and non-farm strategy.The difference of financial capital and social capital among farmer households with different livelihood strategies is not significant;3) The poverty incidence rate of the farmer households with farming-dominated strategy is the highest and farmer households with farming-dominated strategy brings more negative effects on the ecosystem and environment.Due to occupy higher natural capital,farmer households with farming-dominated strategy can choose characteristic agriculture,livelihood diversification,to participate in ecological compensation and other livelihood strategies. |
| Key words: farmer households livelihood capital livelihood strategy consequences for the livelihoods earthquake |
