引用本文
  •    [点击复制]
  •    [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1059次   下载 652 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
华北农田不同耕作方式的固碳效益评价
王福军, 张明园, 张海林, 陈阜
0
(中国农业大学 农学与生物技术学院/农业部农作制度重点开放实验室, 北京 100193)
摘要:
为研究长期耕作措施下农田土壤碳储量以及潜在碳成本的情况,在中国科学院石家庄栾城生态系统试验站进行了长期耕作定位试验,设置免耕(NT)、旋耕(RT)和翻耕(CT)3个处理,并对各处理的固碳效益进行了评价。结果表明在秸秆还田、化肥投入的条件下各处理碳储量均呈现增长趋势,2004-2010年各处理间碳储量平均值由37 867.06增长到48 316.33 kg/hm2,SCS的大小为CT>NT>RT;潜在碳成本NT、RT与CT分别为499.50,516.91和564.84 kg/(hm2 ·a);通过效益评价可知,NT的生态效益最好,各处理间差异显著。RT的经济效益最好,与NT间差异不显著,但RT显著高于CT。建议华北麦玉两熟区农田优化当前农艺措施,提高机械覆盖面积,提升免耕作物经济产量,在此区域适当推广少免耕技术。
关键词:  耕作方式  土壤碳储量  少免耕  潜在碳成本  效益评价
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2012.04.007
投稿时间:2012-03-16
基金项目:公益性行业科研专项(200803028)
Evaluation of tillage treatments on soil carbon sequestration in North China Plain
WANG Fu-jun, ZHANG Ming-yuan, ZHANG Hai-lin, CHEN Fu
(College of Agronomy and Biotechnology/Key Laboratory of Farming System of Ministry of Agriculture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
Abstract:
The study was established at the Luancheng Agro-Ecosystem Experimental Station with three tillage practices under winter wheat growing season:conventional tillage (CT),rotary tillage (RT),and no-tillage (NT).Farmland soil carbon storage,hidden carbon cost (HCC) and benefit evaluation in long-term tillage practice were studied.The results showed that:SCS was increased with times in the condition of straw back and fertilizer input.The average value of SCS was increased from 37 867.06 to 48 316.33 kg/hm2 from 2004 to 2010.The amount of SCS followed the order:CT>NT>RT.HCC of each treatment (NT,RT and CT) was 499.50,516.91 and 564.84 kg/(hm2·a).Ecological benefit was the highest under NT.Economic benefit was the highest under RT,differences of economic benefit index values between NT and RT were not significant.It is better to adopt minimum and no tillage in North China Plain.
Key words:  tillage practice  soil carbon storage  minimum and no tillage  hidden carbon cost  benefit evaluation