本文已被:浏览 1279次 下载 861次 |
![本文二维码信息](/download_upload_file.aspx?file_name=/uploadfile/two_dimensional_code_img/zgnydxxb/2011/4/20110428.png) 码上扫一扫! |
农民田间学校推广农业技术的效果评估——以北京市设施番茄种植户为例 |
肖长坤1,2, 胡瑞法3, 蔡金阳4, 陈阜1, 张涛2
|
|
(1.中国农业大学 农学与生物技术学院,北京 100193;2.北京市植物保护站,北京 100029;3.北京理工大学 管理经济学院,北京 100081中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;4.中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101) |
|
摘要: |
农民田间学校近年来在京郊农村得到了迅速发展。本研究以设施番茄农民田间学校为例,采用随机抽样的方法,调查分析了农民田间学校的培训效果。结果表明:农民田间学校学员户分别和同村非学员、对照村农户相比,设施番茄生产知识与技能方面,测试成绩分别提高13.7%和21.8%;正确施用农药的比率分别提高20.5%和2.5%。生产投入方面,农民田间学校学员用水量分别减少2.3%和12.5%,纯氮和纯磷用量分别比对照村农户减少19.8%和7.2%,纯钾用量增加11.5%;学员在农药用量和劳动与资金投入方面差异不显著。设施番茄产出方面,农民田间学校学员单位面积净收入分别增加11.9%和13.7%。以上结果表明,农民田间学校对北京市农民的设施番茄生产影响显著,特别是使农民的知识和技能得到了显著提高,生产投入明显改善,增产和增收效果明显。今后应该加大政策和资金扶持力度,进一步完善和推广普及农民田间学校。 |
关键词: 农村 农民田间学校 设施番茄 推广效果 评价 |
DOI:10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2011.04.028 |
投稿时间:2011-02-09 |
基金项目: |
|
Impact assessment of technical extension through Farmer Field School:A case of greenhouse tomato farmers in Beijing |
XIAO Chang-kun1,2, HU Rui-fa3, CAI Jin-yang4, CHEN Fu1, ZHANG Tao2
|
(1.College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agriculture University,Beijing 100193,China;2.Beijing Plant Protection Station,Beijing 100019,China;3.School of Management and Economics,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resouces Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;4.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resouces Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China) |
Abstract: |
Farmer Field School(FFS) has rapidly developed in rural area of Beijing in recent years.The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of greenhouse tomato FFS on the management of tomato production.The study is based on interviews to farmers,who were randomly selected.Compared to the non-trained farmers in the same village and control village,the capability of trained farmers was enhanced in the knowledge and skill for tomato production,Their general knowledge and skill were increased 13.7% and 21.8% respectively,and 20.5% or 2.5% higher of rational application of pesticide compared to non-trained farmers or that in control village farmer.The input of the amount of pure nitrogen and pure phosphorus decreased 19.8% and 7.2%,while potassium increased 11.5%,whereas the amount of pesticide input,labors input and total financial input without significant different compared to the control village.The net income increased 11.9% and 13.7% compared to non-trained farmers and that in control village.The results showed there are significant impacts on famer's tomato production after trained in FFS,especially in enhancing farmers' capacity and income increase.Policy suggestions were proposed based on the study to support and popularize the farmer field school activity. |
Key words: village farmer field school greenhouse tomato effect assessment |